Greenpeace considers genetic food a threat to the planet and that they will most likely increase the world hunger instead of lowering it like predicted. The first myth about these is that "genetic engineering is merely an extension of traditional breeding" (Food Fight 1). The reality is different as it has been developed to overcome limitations of traditional breeding. They perform things impossible and the two techniques and risks are completely different. The second myth is …showed first 75 words of 419 total…

…showed last 75 words of 419 total…shows how companies are keeping people in the shadows not fully explaining the problems with GMOs. The facts about the pesticides and about the long-term testing not performed proving them to be safe are developed also by Suzuki. They both have the same arguments on these two. The nutritious part as well as the necessary part are aspects that add on to what Suzuki said about GMOs, proving that they are not worth being sold.