Pinnel's case and promissory estoppel
Title: Pinnel's case and promissory estoppel
Category: /Literature
Details: Words: 2519 | Pages: 9 (approximately 235 words/page)
Pinnel's case and promissory estoppel
Category: /Literature
Details: Words: 2519 | Pages: 9 (approximately 235 words/page)
Literature review:
Pinnel's Case was criticized of its unfairness judgment because Pinnel could go back on his promise that he had made to Cole.
There were 4 main criticisms responded to this rule which were stated by Hickling. The first criticism is that "The Rule Of Pinnel's Case" is a dictum. However, it had been used for 200 to 300 years until Dening J developed the promissory estoppel.
Next, it is also criticized as it illegally extended the
showed first 75 words of 2519 total
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
showed last 75 words of 2519 total
amp;amp; Box 2005, Business Law For Business Students, Thomson, Australia, Sydney, p.115, 129-137
Starke, J.G., Seddon, N.C. & Ellinghaus, M.P. 1992, Cheshire & Fifoot's law of contract, 6th edn, Australia, Perth, p.244
Hickling, 'Law 209 Contract Law with Hickling'. Contracts.
http://faculty.law.ubc.ca/cans/200level/contracts/Contracts%20Spring98%20Hickling.doc (18 Sept. 2005)
Parker. 'Australian Legal System'. Lecture Note Summary. http://www.business.vu.edu.au/blo2206/shenyang%20lecture%20notes.htm (18 Sept. 2005)