"The National Parks Under Siege" - New York Times Editorial: Consider the editorial in light of federalism and the concept that the National Parks are held in trust for the people of the United States.
Title: "The National Parks Under Siege" - New York Times Editorial: Consider the editorial in light of federalism and the concept that the National Parks are held in trust for the people of the United States.
Category: /Social Sciences/Controversial Issues
Details: Words: 384 | Pages: 1 (approximately 235 words/page)
"The National Parks Under Siege" - New York Times Editorial: Consider the editorial in light of federalism and the concept that the National Parks are held in trust for the people of the United States.
Category: /Social Sciences/Controversial Issues
Details: Words: 384 | Pages: 1 (approximately 235 words/page)
I don't believe the federal government makes the best trustee for the park system because they don't have the best interests in mind. They want to revise a policy to satisfy the enjoyment and commercial needs for a hand full of people. For years, the majority of visitors and the park service employees has been happy with the basic management policies of the parks and has seen no reason to revise anything. Then people like …showed first 75 words of 384 total…
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
…showed last 75 words of 384 total…every aspect of life? I do agree with the banning of snowmobiles in Yellowstone though. But with the wolf issue, those people don't live in Wyoming and they aren't ranchers or farmers. Of course someone from California is going to be in favor of putting wolves in Yellowstone, it doesn't affect them. It's all about politics. That's where ridiculous revisions come from; that's where the commercialization comes from; and that's where the exploitation comes from.